PDA

View Full Version : Faith


Nick_A
23rd August 2004, 10:55 AM
There is no worse lie than a truth misunderstood by those who hear it." WILLIAM JAMES

A while back I saw faith being pounded pretty good on another site. It was viewed at best as similar to something that is common now which is this idea of creating your own reality. One can imagine anything they want and who can argue. If one wishes to believe in foolish imagination, no logic can stand up against it. Because faith is a concept difficult to understand and being associated with Christianity, it is no wonder, as it becomes diluted and incorporated into modern thought, that it gets ridiculed as it does on places both IRL and in the cyberworld. However, is real faith as naive as it appears to some? Does it contain deeper meanings not often considered? I believe so. My own readings on it, and I admit from several obscure sources, have lead me to have a great respect for faith as I've grown to understand it. So I thought I would start a thread on it giving a simplified version to begin with of what I've come to value and let others comment on mine or give their own understandings. Who knows, different ideas may become food for thought for some that frown on faith allowing the concept to become more than just an expression of gullibility.


To begin with, there seems to be a discrepancy between the NIV and KJV

First the NIV

Hebrews 11
1Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see.

Now the KJV

Hebrews 11
1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.

The NIV implies an attitude while the KJV implies definition (form).

So in terms of a Hershey bar yet to come, the NIV would define faith as the feeling of assurance that you will receive it while in the KJV, faith would vivify the substance of chocolate. Still something doesn't seem quite right. Back to this shortly in a different context..


Are faith and belief the same? Not from what I have read. It seems to me that belief is the initial step towards faith

Matthew 17 The Healing of a Boy With a Demon.

14When they came to the crowd, a man approached Jesus and knelt before him. 15"Lord, have mercy on my son," he said. "He has seizures and is suffering greatly. He often falls into the fire or into the water. 16I brought him to your disciples, but they could not heal him."
17"O unbelieving and perverse generation," Jesus replied, "how long shall I stay with you? How long shall I put up with you? Bring the boy here to me." 18Jesus rebuked the demon, and it came out of the boy, and he was healed from that moment.
19Then the disciples came to Jesus in private and asked, "Why couldn't we drive it out?"
20He replied, "Because you have so little faith. I tell you the truth, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there' and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you."

Now this occurs right after the Transfiguration at the beginning of Matthew 17. The disciples obviously BELIEVED in Jesus. They gave up everything to follow him. They witnessed the transfiguration. They couldn't drive out the demon though because as Christ said: "Because you have so little faith". I've also read that in some of the ancient translation Christ said it was because they had NO faith. Belief seems more conditioned or sense based so in very limited in its spiritual value. Nicodemus believed becuse of miracles yet Christ told him that "Except a man be born anew, he cannot see the kingdom of God."

Faith is described as a mustard seed. This to me means it has the capacity to grow and change form like a seed becomes a mustard tree. Faith appears to imply direction. Christ in the above passage says: "O unbelieving and perverse generation" What does this have to do with faith. From what I've read, the Greek meaning of the word translated as "perverse" means "turning in many directions". So having no faith means to keep turning in many directions. What does it mean then to keep direction and who could do it?

Luke 7

There a centurion's servant, whom his master valued highly, was sick and about to die. The centurion heard of Jesus and sent some elders of the Jews to him, asking him to come and heal his servant. 4When they came to Jesus, they pleaded earnestly with him, "This man deserves to have you do this, 5because he loves our nation and has built our synagogue." 6So Jesus went with them.
7He was not far from the house when the centurion sent friends to say to him: "Lord, don't trouble yourself, for I do not deserve to have you come under my roof. That is why I did not even consider myself worthy to come to you. But say the word, and my servant will be healed. 8For I myself am a man under authority, with soldiers under me. I tell this one, 'Go,' and he goes; and that one, 'Come,' and he comes. I say to my servant, 'Do this,' and he does it."
9When Jesus heard this, he was amazed at him, and turning to the crowd following him, he said, "I tell you, I have not found such great faith even in Israel." 10Then the men who had been sent returned to the house and found the servant well.

So what is so special about the faith of the centurion? From what I've read, this is a very deep passage and one of its meanings concerns the knowledge of different levels of existence. The centurion is an important man. He has many under his command. Even though powerful on his level, he realizes that he is helpless in the face of higher reality. The centurion then sees the relationship between what is below him and what is above him. His faith is not a manifestation of fear. It is instead a manifestation of a kind of conscious awareness of both his limitations and possibilities. It begins to have definition: substance. He sees the different levels in relation to his true possibilities. His FAITH is now a kind of direct knowing of the value Christ brings. This inner knowing is far beyond surface belief. The value of faith then for me is the growth from the seed of this inner knowing of the relationship between what is above and below. This allows one to acquire direction, the courage to proceed, and not just turn in circles from opposition to oneself. This knowing is not related to the five senses. Because its value is for the higher spiritual aspect, rebirth, it requires perception beyond the senses to higher reality that by definition is not imaginary.

So it seems to me that there is a difference between faith IN something (assurance) and faith as a state of being (substance). The centurians faith was substantial because it had substance, inner definition. It was more than an atitude. It was a form of presence.

So maybe to be without faith means to be without inner substance or definition that can survive the pulls of external life. Faith, if present, can allow one to remain "alive" in the spiritual sense, in the face of external pressures.

Consider this idea in the context of the following passage:

Matthew 6
27Who of you by worrying can add a single hour to his life[ color=#0000ff1] ?
28"And why do you worry about clothes? See how the lilies of the field grow. They do not labor or spin. 29Yet I tell you that not even Solomon in all his splendor was dressed like one of these.

As I understand it, the lillies have a bodily organization that matches their function, their purpose in the context of organic life. For the purpose of man in the spiritual sense which is the movement towards rebirth however, we lack this inner organization, this form, this substance of definition that could allow us to keep separate our external and internal purpose. Solomon, not having the internal substantial organization in accordance with his spiritual possibilities wasn't "complete" as was the lily.

Now it would be quite natural to ask here that if this is true, what can provide for substantial faith? This is another question. One thing at a time.


So this is a basic overview of how I value the possibilities of faith as compared to belief. If any of it is true, it surely doesn't deserve ridicule. How do you understand faith?

venom mama
25th November 2004, 08:04 AM
faith is what you know but don't know how you know it.

bito
27th November 2004, 05:41 AM
As I understand it, the lillies have a bodily organization that matches their function, their purpose in the context of organic life. For the purpose of man in the spiritual sense which is the movement towards rebirth however, we lack this inner organization, this form, this substance of definition that could allow us to keep separate our external and internal purpose. Solomon, not having the internal substantial organization in accordance with his spiritual possibilities wasn't "complete" as was the lily.

In our childish (and childlike :) ) moments, we wish we were flowers or animals or sky or tree...oh, to be born complete...purpose already determined...no soul wrenching...no pondering...no angst... wondering 'why'...or 'what'...or 'when'...or 'where'...or 'how'...

But then, if we were a lily or an oak tree or a cheetah, we wouldn't know love. This seems to be the critical difference between man and flora/fauna...the knowledge of love. Is love our purpose? And if so, what does this mean according to Love?

As for faith, could it be a sensing/intuiting this truth of love-purposing, which keeps us 'going' when we feel like keeping going is the very last thing we want to do?

sahyo
27th November 2004, 07:33 AM
we wish we were flowers or animals or sky or tree...oh, to be born complete...



seems as though can separate?


if we were a lily or an oak tree or a cheetah, we wouldn't know love.

This seems to be the critical difference between man and flora/fauna...the knowledge of love.



not possible know/notknow...knowledge only knowledge


Is love our purpose? And if so, what does this mean according to Love?



:lol:

bito
27th November 2004, 11:04 AM
we wish we were flowers or animals or sky or tree...oh, to be born complete...

seems as though can separate?

Human beings are aware of variables of cause and effect; flowers and animals, no.

if we were a lily or an oak tree or a cheetah, we wouldn't know love.

This seems to be the critical difference between man and flora/fauna...the knowledge of love.


not possible know/notknow...knowledge only knowledge

Love is knowing and knowledge, both. Being and doing. And in the doing, learning from 'screw-ups' (knowledge) so love-wisdom grows. Memory is not just for facts...also for heart!


Is love our purpose? And if so, what does this mean according to Love?

:lol:

:think:

sahyo
27th November 2004, 12:21 PM
cause and effect



seems as though 'because'?




Love is knowing and knowledge, both. Being and doing. And in the doing, learning from 'screw-ups' (knowledge) so love-wisdom grows. Memory is not just for facts...also for heart!



cannot intellectually knowledge/know love

did seem was saying knowledge couldn't be used?

seems memory is 'for' as though a 'reason'?

bito
27th November 2004, 02:44 PM
seems as though 'because'?

No, cause and effect. Action results in reponse. Reponse results in action. Like you and me posting now.

cannot intellectually knowledge/know love

One can reason loving-wisdom action.

did seem was saying knowledge couldn't be used?

Yes.

seems memory is 'for' as though a 'reason'?

Yes. For wisdom-growing.

abhishek
27th November 2004, 09:13 PM
Exactly truth misunderstood is more dangerous then lie as onone knows which way the other person can take this to. :boxing:

sahyo
28th November 2004, 04:14 AM
seems as though 'because'?



No, cause and effect. Action results in reponse. Reponse results in action.

not "results"/"cause and effect"....
rAeCsTpIoOsNing not moreless rAeCsTpIoOsNing

sahyo
28th November 2004, 04:22 AM
One can reason loving-wisdom action.



seems as though "One"?

trying intellectual-logicing-reason
is only memory trying mathematical this = that,
when not possible

bito
28th November 2004, 05:54 AM
bito-this*ing -_- bito-that*ing







:lol:

venom mama
28th November 2004, 09:09 AM
i lived out in the forest until just recently, way out in the forest where there were no people around for miles. i would go walking every night. i didn't need a flashlight or anything because i knew the area so well i could pretty much see in the dark. one night when i was out i was surrounded by a thicket of trees and there were millions, i swear, millions of fireflies around me. there was no sound and i did'nt even feel like i was a part of our world. they were all around me, blinking. it was the most amazing thing. i stood there for so long that when i got back to the house it was hours later. i wish i could express just how absolutly perfect the moments were. it was as if my life was complete. like i had experienced what the whole purpose was. and i always think to myself, even now......




i do believe in faeries, i do.

i do believe.

sahyo
28th November 2004, 09:19 AM
bito-this*ing* -_-* bito-that*ing



hehehe

:D

Nick_A
28th November 2004, 10:03 PM
Bito said:

In our childish (and childlike ) moments, we wish we were flowers or animals or sky or tree...oh, to be born complete...purpose already determined...no soul wrenching...no pondering...no angst... wondering 'why'...or 'what'...or 'when'...or 'where'...or 'how'...

IMO the real wish is to experience deeper "meaning". If one feels they have to be a tree in order to relax into meaning, so be it.


But then, if we were a lily or an oak tree or a cheetah, we wouldn't know love. This seems to be the critical difference between man and flora/fauna...the knowledge of love. Is love our purpose? And if so, what does this mean according to Love?
Part of this knowledge of love is the knowing that we are drawn to it, in the direction of "meaning". All life receives love and is content in what it receives. It permeates the universe and life itself. However, we are drawn to the experience of love of a higher quality, closer to the source, that only our deeper more essential parts of ourselves can feel and awaken to and help the rest of ourselves awaken.

As for faith, could it be a sensing/intuiting this truth of love-purposing, which keeps us 'going' when we feel like keeping going is the very last thing we want to do?

I agree but the problem is that we do not have the capacity for this quality of faith or inner knowing. People use the words "love" and "faith" in a higher sense with the assumption that we have the capacity to experience them at will. We are very far from this. The sacred impulses of faith, love, and hope in the higher sense have atrophied in most cases through lack of use. They exist only in a lesser, more mechanical degree. Faith and hope are provided by external circumstances. This is why it is said that we have faith and/or hope in this, that, or the other thing. We are dependant on the external for our experience. Love for us is selective and variable according to external worldly circumstances interpreted by our defenses. Our inner states are too corrupt to get beyond these lesser qualities of emotion.

bito
29th November 2004, 05:33 AM
Part of this knowledge of love is the knowing that we are drawn to it, in the direction of "meaning". All life receives love and is content in what it receives. It permeates the universe and life itself. However, we are drawn to the experience of love of a higher quality, closer to the source, that only our deeper more essential parts of ourselves can feel and awaken to and help the rest of ourselves awaken.

Is awakening not a 'seeing'/understanding, rather than a moving (drawing) toward?

I agree but the problem is that we do not have the capacity for this quality of faith or inner knowing. People use the words "love" and "faith" in a higher sense with the assumption that we have the capacity to experience them at will. We are very far from this. The sacred impulses of faith, love, and hope in the higher sense have atrophied in most cases through lack of use. They exist only in a lesser, more mechanical degree.

As per 'dictionary.com', the meaning of 'will':

1. The mental faculty by which one deliberately chooses or decides upon a course of action: championed freedom of will against a doctrine of predetermination. The act of exercising the will.
2. Diligent purposefulness; determination: an athlete with the will to win.
3. Self-control; self-discipline: lacked the will to overcome the addiction.
4. A desire, purpose, or determination, especially of one in authority: It is the sovereign's will that the prisoner be spared.

I've heard of the will to power, but never the will to faith. Is faith not a knowing, a deep existence-trusting, rather than a willing? If I will myself to faith, am I not applying my ego-desire rather than my soul-experiencing-knowing?

Faith and hope are provided by external circumstances. This is why it is said that we have faith and/or hope in this, that, or the other thing. We are dependant on the external for our experience. Love for us is selective and variable according to external worldly circumstances interpreted by our defenses. Our inner states are too corrupt to get beyond these lesser qualities of emotion.

I agree that when we say we have faith in someone, or something, it is but a wish that this someone or something will be as we want them to be so we can feel safe, happy, loved, content, etc.

How or why is self 'corrupted'? And is 'beyond' a movement or a seeing/understanding?

Nick_A
29th November 2004, 07:43 AM
Bito

Is awakening not a 'seeing'/understanding, rather than a moving (drawing) toward?

Everything is in motion including the flows of evolution and involution. Awakening itself is in motion and is part of the evolutionary stream. "Understanding" is part of a moving flow within being.

I've heard of the will to power, but never the will to faith. Is faith not a knowing, a deep existence-trusting, rather than a willing? If I will myself to faith, am I not applying my ego-desire rather than my soul-experiencing-knowing?

Faith is more than an inner knowing, it is a substance by which the relationship of the parts are united from top to bottom. Lacking faith, we cannot experience life in the context of the higher and lower we are in touch with. Our reactions are only chaotic without unity. I tried to explain this in the opening post as the faith of the centurion. He had established something within his presence that could be built upon.

The trouble with the dictionary is that it cannot discriminate between acts of will and reactions to desire. What was described as will is reaction to desire. Will is a force that is not dependant on a desire for its activation as in "the will to win" which is really the "desire to win". Willpowere is just the dominace of one desire over another.

The sacred impulses of faith, love, and hope are not stimulated by earthly desire and need will resulting from consciousness for their development.

Christ was trying to teach the disciples how to acquire faith but it wasn't working all that well.

The ego desire that is in service to the higher is not bad. It is the natural function of the ego. However, such understanding would naturally lead to humility and you know how rare that is.

You cannot will faith to occur. You can provide the setting in which it can be experienced through will. This also requires a certain surrender impossible without the knowledge of humility.


How or why is self 'corrupted'? And is 'beyond' a movement or seeing/understanding?

We have three basic ways of experiencing the external world: thought, emotion, and sensations. In a normal human being, they would be connected without imagination and unnecessary fears. They would simply experience the world as a whole meaning the realistic blend of emotion, sensation, and thought. The connections between these three have become so weak and filled with all sorts of fears and imagination that we don't have realistic contact with the external world and nothing to build a realistic connection between the higher and lower in our collective presence that would be normal for man.

This is why our emotions are limited as they are to the earthly realm. We cannot experience higher emotion or "feelings" other than through grace or by getting out of our own way and letting what is "beyond" earthly emotion to enter our experience.

bito
29th November 2004, 08:35 AM
Nick

We understand faith differently, but I dare say both understandings are faith.

At least I think so...

:)

Nick_A
29th November 2004, 10:48 PM
We understand faith differently, but I dare say both understandings are faith.

And on we go Bito. :)

I think you are suggesting that we each have our own "beliefs". Faith is something different in my understanding.