PDA

View Full Version : The Holy Ghost


rich
21st June 2003, 09:23 AM
:o richie t



Group: Members
Posts: 1508
Joined: Jan. 2001
Posted: June 18 2003,02:36

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the posts on this topic are pre-9/11. I know my POV has changed re: The Holy Ghost/Spirit, since writing the post I wrote in this thread.

God has been defined as a Spirit.
A Spirit has been defined as having no body.
I would assume then, that God has no body.
Would also assume that, Spirit/ God are the same.

By thinking this, I am not denying God. I am not denying that their is an intelligence who created and continually creating that which we human-beings call the Universe.

The most learned of us are continually searching for answers about Creation.

AFAIK, God started the ball rolling, and it will continue to roll. forever and ever.
Quote
Gospel of John In the beginnining was The Word and The Word was God.


--------------
Richie


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Polaris

Unregistered




Posted: June 18 2003,03:11

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Richie,

Quote
AFAIK, God started the ball rolling, and it will continue to roll. forever and ever.


Just curious. I'm not going to argue the existence of God since it's not my place to. So assuming God did start the ball rolling, do you think he plays an active part in keeping the ball rolling moment by moment, or wasit a one shot deal and we are rolling along now due to some sort of divine perpetual motion?

I've often been curious as to why, if there is God, does he seem to condemn some people to live empoverished lives full of suffering, and some people die in frighteningly painful ways and yet on the other end of the scale, some live on the top of an ivory tower with food and lavish surroundings. I guess I've always been confused about that. I think about an innocent child born into horrendous poverty or cruelty and wonder, what sin could that child possibly have done in his short lifetime to deserve such suffering.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



richie t



Group: Members
Posts: 1508
Joined: Jan. 2001
Posted: June 18 2003,05:35

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
God is not responsible for the rules and conditions that man has made. The Spirit/ God, gave man free will. Man is the one responsible for rules and regulations, including the monetary system, religious rules and dogma. Why blame the Creator for the creation made. Blame the misuse of the free will, given as a gift from God to we human-beings.

Could you have it any other way?

--------------
Richie


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Polaris

Unregistered




Posted: June 18 2003,06:42

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote
God is not responsible for the rules and conditions that man has made. The Spirit/ God, gave man free will. Man is the one responsible for rules and regulations, including the monetary system, religious rules and dogma. Why blame the Creator for the creation made. Blame the misuse of the free will, given as a gift from God to we human-beings.

Could you have it any other way?


No, I don't think I could have it any other way. I think you are completely right and that man is responsible for the conditions man has made. And I think you are extremely open-minded compared to many of the other Christians I have run across in my day.

Take Confession, for instance. I think it's great that people recognise their wrong doings and confess them as a form of *personal repentance* but it seems to me that the main reason people go to Confession is not for personal repentance but to recieve forgiveness from God. And I note that they always get that forgiveness provided they do a certain number of Hail Marys. Then feeling like their sins have been washed away with God's forgiveness they go off to do the same misdeeds all over again, filling in their clean slate with sin for next week's confession.

Or if something goes wrong in their life they don't take responsibility for the fact that perhaps they might have done something wrong to cause the misfortune. Instead it becomes a "test from God" or "God's will" etc.... There's a general feeling of "passing the buck".

A few years ago I was lightly explaining things like karma and she emailed me back and wondered how could I believe in something that left me so powerless. She thought that karma meant that my fate was already sealed and that nothing I could do now could change it. But it's not like that at all. It's completely empowering to know that what we do makes a difference. I can be a jerk all my life and die a million deaths, or I can put effort into being good and if I still end up dying a million deaths then at least I will have hopefully lessened somebody else's suffering. Because it's not about ME. I don't matter. Whatever I do, I do for the other guy and if you can make that happen then it stands to reason that you shouldn't have anything to confess. You will not have hurt anything or anybody if you take their well-being into consideration first. It should technically get pretty easy if you manage to get to that point 24/7 (I am not there yet so I couldn't tell you for sure


"Practice makes perfect" so they say.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



asheera

Unregistered




Posted: June 18 2003,12:22

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote

or I can put effort into being good and if I still end up dying a million deaths then at least I will have hopefully lessened somebody else's suffering. Because it's not about ME. I don't matter. Whatever I do, I do for the other guy and if you can make that happen then it stands to reason that you shouldn't have anything to confess. You will not have hurt anything or anybody if you take their well-being into consideration first.



"effort" = reacting
...when reacting-effort, which may appear to lessen suffering
may prolong or strengthen it

no "make that happen"



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Polaris

Unregistered




Posted: June 18 2003,21:31

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asheera

Quote
"effort" = reacting
...when reacting-effort, which may appear to lessen suffering
may prolong or strengthen it

no "make that happen"


But is it the reacting-effort which causes the suffering or the attachement to an expected or desired outcome?

If I practice Right Effort to the very best of my ability then it will lessen suffering if even minimally. Yet if I attach myself to whatever suffering remains THEN I have possibly prolonged or strengthened it.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



richie t



Group: Members
Posts: 1508
Joined: Jan. 2001
Posted: June 18 2003,23:01

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Polaris,
Why have any expectations? By having expectations for happenings which are out of your control, makes you vulnerable. 1st gain control, then expectations are not needed,
they just happen. <<<-----(i Think)

--------------
Richie


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
to be continued:

rich
21st June 2003, 09:50 AM
continued from previous post, from old discussion board:

Polaris

Unregistered




Posted: June 19 2003,00:12

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richie

Quote
Polaris,
Why have any expectations? By having expectations for happenings which are out of your control, makes you vulnerable. 1st gain control, then expectations are not needed,
they just happen. <<<-----(i Think)


When I take a drink from a glass I expect it to not dribble all down my shirt. However, sometimes it does unexpectedly. Just the way it is.

But I see your point and I agree.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



asheera

Unregistered




Posted: June 19 2003,02:18

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
polaris

Quote

But is it the reacting-effort which causes the suffering or the attachement to an expected or desired outcome?



is thinking-"expected or desired outcome" which suffers

was responsing:
Quote

or I can put effort into being good and if I still end up dying a million deaths then at least I will have hopefully lessened somebody else's suffering.



was refering "I will have hopefully lessened somebody else's suffering."
....which may 'seem' like lessening suffering " may prolong or strengthen it" ....
however, no right-wrong

Quote

If I practice Right Effort to the very best of my ability then it will lessen suffering if even minimally. Yet if I attach myself to whatever suffering remains THEN I have possibly prolonged or strengthened it.



"Right Effort".....no right-wrong

trying "Right Effort" = thinking-attachment (no attachement-detachment)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Polaris

Unregistered




Posted: June 19 2003,03:50

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quote
was refering "I will have hopefully lessened somebody else's suffering."
....which may 'seem' like lessening suffering " may prolong or strengthen it" ....
however, no right-wrong


Okay. gotcha

Quote
"Right Effort".....no right-wrong

trying "Right Effort" = thinking-attachment (no attachement-detachment)


Okey-dokey there too

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



asheera

Unregistered




Posted: June 19 2003,03:55

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



richie t



Group: Members
Posts: 1508
Joined: Jan. 2001
Posted: June 19 2003,04:07

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
no right, no wrong.

What may be right to/for you, may be wrong for/to me,
What may be wrong to/for you, may be right for/to me,
What may be wrong to/for you, may be wrong for/to me and,
What may be right to/for you, may be right for/to me.
I think!


--------------
Richie


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



richie t



Group: Members
Posts: 1508
Joined: Jan. 2001
Posted: June 19 2003,04:10

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote (richie t @ June 19 2003,04:07)
no right, no wrong.

What may be right to/for you, may be wrong for/to me,
What may be wrong to/for you, may be right for/to me,
What may be wrong to/for you, may be wrong for/to me and,
What may be right to/for you, may be right for/to me.
I think!


no 'you'
no 'me'

This post known as beating asheera to the post.


--------------
Richie


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



asheera

Unregistered




Posted: June 19 2003,07:57

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

rich
21st June 2003, 09:55 AM
Did asheera delete last reply on this topic? :unsure:

IOW: Now you see it, and now you don't. :lol: Thought I was the only one who would do such a thing. ;) :D

sahyo
21st June 2003, 10:07 AM
didn't delete...
the smilie didn't transfer

:)

rich
21st June 2003, 10:24 AM
Originally posted by asheera@Jun 21 2003, 09:07 AM
didn't delete...
the smilie didn't transfer

:)
:unsure: The same smilie as posted here :( , on this reply? or a different smilie? ;) , like this: :D ?
ah forget it, for, actually, after looking over the transferred posts, smilies were lost in many other posts.
Thanks asheera. :)

thirst4sun
11th November 2003, 12:26 PM
Hello Richi,
I am your newest member to this site and I am eager to have the wisdom that you have. I do have a question about this quote: AFAIK, God started the ball rolling, and it will continue to roll. forever and ever.
Do you think that the ball will continue to roll forever or will there eventually be total awareness with all creation? Will this circle ever end in peace?

DavidS
12th November 2003, 06:41 AM
Originally posted by thirst4sun@Nov 10 2003, 10:26 PM
Do you think that the ball will continue to roll forever or will there eventually be total awareness with all creation? Will this circle ever end in peace?
The issue of 'peace' in the 'outer' world is debatable. Given the state, or 'stage', of most people's development at this point in history, I think 'outer' 'harmony' and 'peace' on the world-stage is unlikely, at least in our personal lifetimes. But many report that they have internally realized oneness with all creation and are completely 'at peace' with everyone and everything going on. It is "one 'drop' at a time" that the 'river' reaches the 'ocean'.

May you be one such - lovingly - David :)

a random hack
12th November 2003, 08:34 AM
The issue of 'peace' in the 'outer' world is debatable. Given the state, or 'stage', of most people's development at this point in history, I think 'outer' 'harmony' and 'peace' on the world-stage is unlikely, at least in our personal lifetimes. But many report that they have internally realized oneness with all creation and are completely 'at peace' with everyone and everything going on. It is "one 'drop' at a time" that the 'river' reaches the 'ocean'.

am reassured by the number of people i meet looking for 'answers' :)